<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patent News Daily &#187; bad advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentnewsdaily.com/category/bad-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentnewsdaily.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On the Road: Bilski Examiner Interview and CNN</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/13/on-the-road-bilski-examiner-interview-and-cnn/id=4557/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/13/on-the-road-bilski-examiner-interview-and-cnn/id=4557/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Malek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventors Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology & Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisional patent application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the better part of last week in Washington, DC conducting Examiner interviews for some of my clients that have pending software patent applications.  The great news is that I believe we now have a handle on the ever changing Bilski ruling.  I know it sounds like a misstatement to say that [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/13/examiner-interview-changes-favor-in-person-meeting/id=4562/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Examiner Interview Changes Favor In Person Meeting'>Examiner Interview Changes Favor In Person Meeting</a><small>Last week I was at the Patent Office interviewing a case along with Mark Malek, who was in town from</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/29/how-to-patent-software-in-a-post-bilski-era/id=4311/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era'>How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era</a><small>Those familiar with the ongoing debate regarding the patentability of software and business methods </small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/05/19/bilski-not-so-bad-for-software-patents-after-all/id=3582/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski Not So Bad for Software Patents After All'>Bilski Not So Bad for Software Patents After All</a><small>On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its much anti</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I spent the better part of last week in Washington, DC conducting Examiner interviews for some of my clients that have pending software patent applications.  The great news is that I believe we now have a handle on the ever changing Bilski ruling.  I know it sounds like a misstatement to say that [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/13/examiner-interview-changes-favor-in-person-meeting/id=4562/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Examiner Interview Changes Favor In Person Meeting'>Examiner Interview Changes Favor In Person Meeting</a><small>Last week I was at the Patent Office interviewing a case along with Mark Malek, who was in town from</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/29/how-to-patent-software-in-a-post-bilski-era/id=4311/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era'>How to Patent Software in a Post Bilski Era</a><small>Those familiar with the ongoing debate regarding the patentability of software and business methods </small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/05/19/bilski-not-so-bad-for-software-patents-after-all/id=3582/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski Not So Bad for Software Patents After All'>Bilski Not So Bad for Software Patents After All</a><small>On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its much anti</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/13/on-the-road-bilski-examiner-interview-and-cnn/id=4557/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
