<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patent News Daily &#187; bpai</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentnewsdaily.com/category/bpai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentnewsdaily.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another KSR Retrospective</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/another-ksr-retrospective/id=4674/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/another-ksr-retrospective/id=4674/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museum of Obscure Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bpai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr v. teleflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obvious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obviousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On that fateful day some 27 months ago, April 30, 2007 to be precise, the United States Supreme Court decided that the well established and functional bright line rule for obviousness was too rigid.  No longer must there be a teaching, motiviation or suggestion to render an invention unpatentable for obviousness reasons.  No in this [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/20/obscure-patent-ksr/id=4193/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean Much'>Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean Much</a><small>So much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. Teleflex, which hap</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/21/ksr-day-at-the-napp-conference-in-san-diego/id=4631/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: KSR Day at the NAPP Conference in San Diego'>KSR Day at the NAPP Conference in San Diego</a><small>I am still in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent P</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/03/30/crazy-patents-in-an-era-of-alleged-patent-quality/id=2413/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Crazy Patents in an Era of Alleged Patent Quality'>Crazy Patents in an Era of Alleged Patent Quality</a><small> Over the last several years the patent allowance rate has fallen from about 70% of applications bec</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On that fateful day some 27 months ago, April 30, 2007 to be precise, the United States Supreme Court decided that the well established and functional bright line rule for obviousness was too rigid.  No longer must there be a teaching, motiviation or suggestion to render an invention unpatentable for obviousness reasons.  No in this [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/20/obscure-patent-ksr/id=4193/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean Much'>Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean Much</a><small>So much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. Teleflex, which hap</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/21/ksr-day-at-the-napp-conference-in-san-diego/id=4631/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: KSR Day at the NAPP Conference in San Diego'>KSR Day at the NAPP Conference in San Diego</a><small>I am still in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent P</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/03/30/crazy-patents-in-an-era-of-alleged-patent-quality/id=2413/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Crazy Patents in an Era of Alleged Patent Quality'>Crazy Patents in an Era of Alleged Patent Quality</a><small> Over the last several years the patent allowance rate has fallen from about 70% of applications bec</small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/another-ksr-retrospective/id=4674/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KSR Day at the NAPP Conference in San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/21/ksr-day-at-the-napp-conference-in-san-diego/id=4631/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/21/ksr-day-at-the-napp-conference-in-san-diego/id=4631/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Fools™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of patent appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bpai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce stoner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inter partes reexamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ksr v. teleflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[napp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national association of patent practitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reexamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am still in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent Practitioners, which is being held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, which is roughly across the street from the U.S.S. Midway.  The conference has been a good one with some excellent presentations.  This morning there was a Bilski presentation, [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/another-ksr-retrospective/id=4674/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another KSR Retrospective'>Another KSR Retrospective</a><small>On that fateful day some 27 months ago, April 30, 2007 to be precise, the United States Supreme Cour</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/20/bipartisan-questioning-of-patent-reform-in-us-senate/id=4624/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bipartisan Questioning of Patent Reform in US Senate'>Bipartisan Questioning of Patent Reform in US Senate</a><small>Today I am in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent P</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/08/patent-practitioners-2009-annual-meeting-in-san-diego/id=3990/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Patent Practitioners 2009 Annual Meeting in San Diego'>Patent Practitioners 2009 Annual Meeting in San Diego</a><small>The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP) will be holding the 2009 Annual Meeting and </small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am still in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent Practitioners, which is being held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, which is roughly across the street from the U.S.S. Midway.  The conference has been a good one with some excellent presentations.  This morning there was a Bilski presentation, [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/24/another-ksr-retrospective/id=4674/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another KSR Retrospective'>Another KSR Retrospective</a><small>On that fateful day some 27 months ago, April 30, 2007 to be precise, the United States Supreme Cour</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/20/bipartisan-questioning-of-patent-reform-in-us-senate/id=4624/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bipartisan Questioning of Patent Reform in US Senate'>Bipartisan Questioning of Patent Reform in US Senate</a><small>Today I am in San Diego, California at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Patent P</small></li><li><a href='http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/06/08/patent-practitioners-2009-annual-meeting-in-san-diego/id=3990/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Patent Practitioners 2009 Annual Meeting in San Diego'>Patent Practitioners 2009 Annual Meeting in San Diego</a><small>The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP) will be holding the 2009 Annual Meeting and </small></li></ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/21/ksr-day-at-the-napp-conference-in-san-diego/id=4631/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
